Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2024

This is Me:  Revision of a co-designed resource to communicate what matters most to older adults with cancer when treatment decisions are being considered. (#437)

Nicole Kinnane 1 , Catherine Devereux 1 , Paul Baden 2 , Marilyn Dolling 3 , Christopher Steer 4 5 6 , Amit Khot 7 8 , Donna Milne 9 10 , Aileen Wilkinson 11 , Trish Joyce 8 , David Gyorki 7 9 12 , Alexander Heriot 7 11 12 , Mei Krishnasamy 1 2 10
  1. Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. VCCC Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. Independent Consumer Advocate, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. Border Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury Wodonga, NSW, Australia
  5. UNSW School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Rural Clinical Campus, Albury, NSW, Australia
  6. John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University Wodonga Campus, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia
  7. Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  8. Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  9. Skin and Melanoma Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  10. Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  11. Lower GI Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  12. Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Background

Determining what matters most to older adults with cancer is integral to delivery of age-friendly care. Although international evidence demonstrates substantial benefits of doing so, this does not happen routinely in practice1. This is Me (TiM) is a novel Australian co-designed self-report tool addressing functional/physical/emotional health; comorbidities; cognition; social inclusion; preferences for quality or quantity of life; It enables older adults to communicate with their cancer team about what matters most to them.

Aims

Prior to dissemination of TiM resource for use in routine practice, we consulted older adults to revise wording and content to ensure it is fit for purpose.

Methodology

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Eligible consumers (patients/carers) were recruited from Melanoma, Multiple Myeloma (MM), Lower Gastrointestinal (LGI) services at a tertiary cancer centre. Modified Cognitive Interviewing techniques (CI) of verbal probing and think aloud approaches2-4 explored interpretation of each resource item. Data were analysed using qualitative manifest content analysis to inform resource revision.

Results

Ten consumers (4 MM/6 LGI) participated across two rounds of CI (9 Patients/1 Carer). Words identified with most ambiguity were diet and medications. The time frame ‘In the last six months’ regarding possible events e.g. falls/weight loss was considered too lengthy. Response options in the ‘What’s important’ domain required refinement to indicate more clearly its focus on what matters most to people. Instructions for completing TiM, including how the information could be used, were recommended.

Conclusion

TiM items were refined to align with consumer preferences and intent of the resource. Brief instructions were developed to support its use in practice. Further research is warranted to determine feasibility of TiM to prompt discussion of what matters most to older adults in clinical contexts. A national survey is underway exploring multidisciplinary cancer clinicians’ views of TiM as a component of usual care.

  1. Laderman M, Jackson C, Little K, et al. What Matters to Older Adults? A Toolkit for Health Systems to Design Better Care with Older Adults; 2019.
  2. Beatty PC, Willis GB. Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public opinion quarterly 2007;71(2):287-311.
  3. Willis GB, Artino Jr AR. What do our respondents think we're asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. Journal of graduate medical education 2013;5(3):353-56.
  4. Wolcott MD, Lobczowski NG. Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 2021;13(2):181-88.