Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2024

Can we help carers manage fear of cancer recurrence: Developing a cancer carer-specific fear of cancer recurrence intervention  (#559)

Kyra Webb 1 , Alexis Taing 2 , Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell 1 , Louise Sharpe 2 , Lisa Beatty 3 , Hannah Banks 1 , Haryana Dhillon 1 4 , Laura Kirsten 5 , Kirsty Galpin 1 , Megan Jeon 1 , Nicci Bartley 1 , Joanne Shaw 1
  1. The Psycho-oncology Co-operative Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  3. College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  4. Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision Making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  5. Nepean Cancer Services, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Nepean, New South Wales, Australia

Background: Fear of cancer recurrence or progression (FCR) is a key concern for cancer carers. Nearly half of all carers (48%) report FCR levels considered clinically significant among cancer survivors, but few interventions have been evaluated for carer FCR. A carer-specific intervention, underpinned by a clinically relevant model of carer FCR, is needed. Conquer Fear, based on the Cognitive Processing Model, is a 5-session psychologist delivered intervention with demonstrated efficacy in reducing survivor FCR.

Aims: We aimed to adapt the evidence-based Conquer Fear FCR intervention for cancer carers. 

Methods: We first mapped caregiver-specific FCR experiences to the Cognitive Processing Model and then used a co-design methodology to review and adapt the Conquer Fear intervention to reflect the constructs underpinning carer FCR and an online format. As part of co-design, an expert panel (psycho-oncology clinicians and researchers; n= 11) provided feedback on the clinical content and cancer carers (n= 14) reviewed the format and overall online approach.

Results: Many of the constructs in the model were common with FCR for cancer survivors, therefore the following components were retained: attention training, metacognitive therapy, detached mindfulness and values clarification. However, carers also expressed unique concerns including fear of losing a loved one and difficulties in communication around FCR. In response, we added context for carer FCR addressing the fears of losing a loved one and personal responsibility. We also added a session on the importance of communication. Although hypervigilance was identified amongst carers with high FCR, the behavioural contract relating to surveillance was removed. These adaptions resulted in a 4-session online program.

Conclusions: We have developed a theoretically derived, carer-specific FCR intervention, ready for evaluation. Involving carers in co-designing the intervention may increase acceptability and will be assessed in our planned pilot study.